The U.S. Courtroom of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit discovered no error in a district courtroom’s ruling denying a bariatric surgical procedure affected person’s medical insurance declare for a associated medical complication, discovering neither Iowa regulation nor the Reasonably priced Care Act required that his therapy be coated.
The appellate courtroom panel affirmed an order by U.S. District Decide Robert W. Pratt of the Southern District of Iowa, granting abstract judgment to Zimmerman Switch Inc. and Profit Plan Directors of Eau Claire LLC (BPA) on Darrin Shafer’s declare for medical insurance advantages underneath the Worker Retirement Earnings Safety Act of 1974, after he made a declare for advantages for therapy referring to problems along with his bariatric surgical procedure, in line with a June 7 opinion.
