U.S. Supreme Court docket
Lawyer-client privilege case dismissed by Supreme Court docket
Picture from Shutterstock.
The U.S. Supreme Court docket has dismissed an attorney-client privilege case two weeks after listening to oral arguments.
The excessive courtroom dismissed In Re Grand Jury as improvidently granted Monday, SCOTUSblog studies.
At difficulty was what test courts ought to apply when contemplating whether or not to guard “dual-purpose” documents that comprise authorized and nonlegal recommendation. An unnamed legislation agency specializing in worldwide tax legislation was combating disclosure of dual-purpose paperwork sought by the federal government in an investigation of a shopper.
A choose held the legislation agency in contempt for failing to show over disputed paperwork, and the ninth U.S. Circuit Court docket of Appeals at San Francisco affirmed in 2021.
The ninth Circuit dominated that courts ought to look to the “major objective” of a communication when it entails authorized and nonlegal evaluation. Paperwork could also be privileged when the first objective was to acquire authorized recommendation.
The ninth Circuit rejected a extra expansive take a look at superior by the agency that protects paperwork if acquiring authorized recommendation was one of many “important functions” of the communication.
The ABA had supported the firm in an amicus temporary. The federal authorities backed the “major objective” take a look at.
Throughout oral arguments Jan. 9, Justice Neil Gorsuch mentioned the take a look at backed by the federal government sounded lots just like the agency’s take a look at.
“What’s the disagreement?” Gorsuch had requested.
In response to SCOTUSblog, instances are often dismissed as improvidently granted in three circumstances. They’re:
• The Supreme Court docket discovers after the cert grant that the case is a poor car for resolving the difficulty earlier than the courtroom. “For instance, the information could not really current the query, there could also be a jurisdictional drawback or it might come to gentle that an argument wasn’t correctly preserved,” SCOTUSblog mentioned. That is the commonest cause for dismissing a case as improvidently granted, which is called a “DIG.”
• The Supreme Court docket perceives a “bait-and-switch,” which occurs when petitioners depend on a special argument in briefing than they did within the cert petition.
• The courtroom is unable to succeed in a consensus and apparently thinks {that a} DIG is preferable to fractured opinions with no controlling rationale.
