A federal choose in Pennsylvania sided with Kang Haggerty on former shoppers’ counterclaim of breach of fiduciary obligation, however allowed breach-of-contract claims from each side to proceed.
In a March 29 opinion, U.S. District Decide John R. Padova of the Japanese District of Pennsylvania granted Kang Haggerty’s movement for abstract judgment with regard to its former shoppers’ counterclaim that the agency breached its fiduciary obligation. Nonetheless, Padova, figuring out {that a} real problem of truth existed, denied the agency’s movement for abstract judgment with regard to each its personal contract claims towards the previous shoppers and the previous shoppers’ counterclaim for breach of contract.
