Legal professionals for the girl accused of being the 1990 Wellington Killer Clown have filed a brand new movement asking for a key piece of proof to be excluded at trial.Sheila Eager-Warren’s legal professionals argue the state has the unsuitable getaway automobile.Prosecutors say they’ve the suitable automobile and it has essential proof linking Eager-Warren to the homicide of Marlene Warren 32 years in the past.Moments after somebody dressed as a clown delivered flowers and balloons to Marlene Warren, after which shot her within the face, the killer slowly walked to a White Chrysler LeBaron and drove away.4 days later, police discovered a stolen LeBaron in a close-by Winn-Dixie parking zone and decided it was the getaway automobile.Prosecutors plan on utilizing hair and a wig fiber present in that automobile to assist attempt Sheila Eager-Warren for the homicide.However Marlene Warren’s son Joey Ahrens — an eyewitness to his mom’s homicide — stated on a 1991 radio present the automobile he noticed was not a convertible just like the one at Winn-Dixie.When requested by host Jack Cole what sort of automobile was it, Ahrens replied: “It was a white one.”Cole: “Onerous high convertible?”Ahrens: “It appeared like a tough high to me.”Cole: “It regarded like a tough high”Michael Warren, the sufferer’s husband, was additionally on the present, and confirmed his step-son described a distinct automobile:“He advised me the automobile was a sq. mannequin of LeBaron, which, the brand new ones are extra glossy; he thought that it wasn’t a brand new one, it was extra of an older mannequin,” stated Warren.Ahrens and the three different witnesses additionally say the clown automobile didn’t have a black stripe just like the Winn-Dixie automobile.Ahrens’ girlfriend Jean Pratt was much more satisfied, saying in a police interview she had seen the photographs of the Winn-Dixie automobile twice now and was “constructive” it was not the suitable automobile.Protection attorneys Greg Rosenfeld and Amy Morse wrote of their movement police discovered three stolen white LeBarons after the homicide, earlier than deciding on the Winn-Dixie one.So how, then, did Sheila Eager-Warren’s hair get into that automobile?Her legal professionals stated her boss, Michael Warren, with whom she was allegedly having an affair and later married, allegedly stole the automobile from a competing rental automobile enterprise as a part of an ongoing feud 5 weeks earlier than the homicide. Was the hair transferred by him? The legal professionals don’t say.Legal professionals use “Hobbit” analogyRegardless, they argue the state can not hyperlink the Winn-Dixie automobile to the homicide, Rosenfeld writing:”To attract an analogy from the characters of The Hobbit, this might be like attempting to show that Frodo stole Gollum’s ring by introducing proof that Frodo was with Bilbo when Bilbo trespassed in a goblin cave 5 weeks earlier.”The movement asks the choose to exclude the Winn-Dixie LeBaron from the proof, and if not, to compel the state to definitively hyperlink it to the homicide earlier than any dialogue or presentation of it.The choose has but to reschedule the trial, which has been continued seven occasions.
Legal professionals for the girl accused of being the 1990 Wellington Killer Clown have filed a brand new movement asking for a key piece of proof to be excluded at trial.
Sheila Eager-Warren’s legal professionals argue the state has the unsuitable getaway automobile.
Prosecutors say they’ve the suitable automobile and it has essential proof linking Eager-Warren to the homicide of Marlene Warren 32 years in the past.
Moments after somebody dressed as a clown delivered flowers and balloons to Marlene Warren, after which shot her within the face, the killer slowly walked to a White Chrysler LeBaron and drove away.
4 days later, police discovered a stolen LeBaron in a close-by Winn-Dixie parking zone and decided it was the getaway automobile.
Prosecutors plan on utilizing hair and a wig fiber present in that automobile to assist attempt Sheila Eager-Warren for the homicide.
However Marlene Warren’s son Joey Ahrens — an eyewitness to his mom’s homicide — stated on a 1991 radio present the automobile he noticed was not a convertible just like the one at Winn-Dixie.
When requested by host Jack Cole what sort of automobile was it, Ahrens replied: “It was a white one.”
Cole: “Onerous high convertible?”
Ahrens: “It appeared like a tough high to me.”
Cole: “It regarded like a tough high”
Michael Warren, the sufferer’s husband, was additionally on the present, and confirmed his step-son described a distinct automobile:
“He advised me the automobile was a sq. mannequin of LeBaron, which, the brand new ones are extra glossy; he thought that it wasn’t a brand new one, it was extra of an older mannequin,” stated Warren.
Ahrens and the three different witnesses additionally say the clown automobile didn’t have a black stripe just like the Winn-Dixie automobile.
Ahrens’ girlfriend Jean Pratt was much more satisfied, saying in a police interview she had seen the photographs of the Winn-Dixie automobile twice now and was “constructive” it was not the suitable automobile.
Protection attorneys Greg Rosenfeld and Amy Morse wrote of their movement police discovered three stolen white LeBarons after the homicide, earlier than deciding on the Winn-Dixie one.
So how, then, did Sheila Eager-Warren’s hair get into that automobile?
Her legal professionals stated her boss, Michael Warren, with whom she was allegedly having an affair and later married, allegedly stole the automobile from a competing rental automobile enterprise as a part of an ongoing feud 5 weeks earlier than the homicide.
Was the hair transferred by him? The legal professionals don’t say.
Legal professionals use “Hobbit” analogy
Regardless, they argue the state can not hyperlink the Winn-Dixie automobile to the homicide, Rosenfeld writing:
“To attract an analogy from the characters of The Hobbit, this might be like attempting to show that Frodo stole Gollum’s ring by introducing proof that Frodo was with Bilbo when Bilbo trespassed in a goblin cave 5 weeks earlier.”
The movement asks the choose to exclude the Winn-Dixie LeBaron from the proof, and if not, to compel the state to definitively hyperlink it to the homicide earlier than any dialogue or presentation of it.
The choose has but to reschedule the trial, which has been continued seven occasions.
