An Oregon legal professional has been reprimanded failing to memorialize the important phrases of a contract below which his purchasers agreed to carry out building work in lieu of paying authorized charges.
In a Feb. 16 opinion, the Oregon Supreme Court docket affirmed the reprimand of Leonard Duboff for violating RPC 1.8 (a) after he entered right into a enterprise relationship with a consumer with out getting important phrases in writing.
Youth-led climate change lawsuits gain momentum with backing of liberal, dark money group Fox Information Source link
Embattled social media platform TikTok stated Friday that Common Counsel Erich Andersen has stepped all the way down to deal...
Geo Group Announces Settlement in Shareholder Litigation - TipRanks.com TipRanks Source link
How I Made Legislation Agency Management: 'Each Lawyer's Foreign money Is Their Personal Apply,' Says Jason Novak of Norton Rose...
