A panel of the U.S. Courtroom of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has requested the Oregon Supreme Courtroom to interpret the phrase “direct bodily loss or harm” within the context of a COVID-19 business property insurance coverage coverage dispute.
Chief Choose Mary H. Murguia authored the April 10 order, by which a panel of circuit judges sought a solution to the query: “Can the precise or potential presence of the COVID-19 virus on an insured’s premises represent ‘direct bodily loss or harm to property’ for functions of protection below a business property insurance coverage coverage?”
