A federal decide in Maryland has denied a defendant linked to Raging Bull’s movement to dismiss claims filed by the Federal Commerce Fee that alleged he helped the subscription-based funding coaching firm defraud shoppers over $137 million.
The person defendant, Kyle Dennis, a “salesman and buying and selling teacher” with Raging Bull, filed a movement to dismiss the FTC’s criticism in opposition to him. The FTC alleged that Dennis violated two counts of Part 5(a) of the FTC Act by “‘characterize[ing], immediately or not directly, expressly or by implication, that customers who buy Raging Bull’s providers will earn or are more likely to earn substantial earnings,’” in line with the court’s opinion filed March 15 in U.S. District Court docket for the District of Maryland.
