Please be aware this content material was initially revealed in Thomson Reuters.
The total article could be accessed here.
Conclusion
What number of corporations of solicitors in London representing abroad trustees anticipate being served in London with an utility for third-party disclosure in opposition to their abroad trustee purchasers, in respect of a declare which doesn’t instantly relate to the trusts in query? The reply should be: not many.
The impact of those choices is that abroad trustees who might imagine that their paperwork are outdoors the grasp of the English courts by advantage of the truth that they themselves are abroad are the truth is liable to a disclosure order that could be made in England and Wales, could also be served on them with out recourse to the letter of request regime, and should the truth is be served on their English solicitors in London as a substitute of on them personally within the abroad jurisdiction, if their paperwork are held (both electronically or bodily) by their solicitors in London.
The Courtroom of Enchantment’s resolution will alleviate considerations to an extent. It restricted its willpower to affirming the Excessive Courtroom’s jurisdiction to allow service out of a third-party disclosure utility to when the paperwork in query are positioned inside England and Wales. The choice could also be narrower nonetheless—in circumstances the place the paperwork in query, though positioned in England and Wales, haven’t any different hyperlinks to the jurisdiction, this may occasionally level in opposition to the court docket’s train of discretion to serve out. The place paperwork are positioned outdoors of the jurisdiction, the Courtroom of Enchantment has declined to offer a definitive reply, albeit the Excessive Courtroom affirmed the jurisdiction. In any occasion, the train of discretion would probably militate in opposition to an order allowing service out in all however distinctive circumstances.
However, the choices have wide-ranging ramifications for the belief business and are a salutary warning that events outdoors of England and Wales will not be out of this court docket’s jurisdictional attain. While the choices ought to in fact not deter non-UK trustees from acquiring obligatory English recommendation, there’s a want, in probably contentious conditions, for non-contentious and contentious legal professionals to coordinate to assist trustees handle the dangers of holding digital copies of paperwork in England and Wales. Extra broadly, it’s a useful reminder of the truth that it’s all the time within the trustees’ long-term pursuits to supply paperwork mindfully (i.e. having in thoughts the opportunity of others seeing these paperwork sooner or later).
It’s a additional lesson that for belief practitioners the intricate provisions of the CPR should be at our fingertips. The foundations inside the CPR can typically seem overly advanced and open to differing interpretations, however the guidelines inside Pt 6 present for smart and efficient technique of attaining the overriding goal, which is that the court docket ought to take care of circumstances justly and at proportionate value. These guidelines can work to our purchasers’ benefit, and drawback. What the court docket did on this case was use the CPR guidelines to offer for early disclosure by an environment friendly mechanism, in order to permit for the paperwork in query to be produced earlier than trial, thus permitting the declare to proceed with out severe disruption. Little question that *P.C.B. 11 furthers the overriding goal, however furtherance of that goal is more likely to be fairly low down on an offshore trustees’ record of priorities when instructing London counsel. The lesson on this case is that, with a view to advance our purchasers’ pursuits, a transparent and purposive understanding of the CPR ’s darkest corners is crucial.
With due to Niamh Herrett for contributing to this text.
When you require additional details about something lined on this briefing, please contact Joseph de Lacey or Rowan Cope your normal contact on the agency on +44 (0)20 3375 7000.
This publication is a basic abstract of the regulation. It mustn’t exchange authorized recommendation tailor-made to your particular circumstances.
© Farrer & Co LLP, January 2023