A Colorado appeals court docket reversed a decrease court docket’s ruling that had been based mostly on an insurer’s inner settlement analysis, after figuring out that such an analysis doesn’t set up an ”undisputed” quantity of advantages owed.
In a March 30 opinion, the Colorado Courtroom of Appeals reversed and remanded a trial court docket’s ruling after concluding it had erred in counting on defendant GEICO Casualty Co.’s inner settlement analysis as a foundation for concluding that some portion of plaintiff Marcus A. Worry’s claimed noneconomic damages had been “undisputed.”