A federal decide in Massachusetts final week denied CVS’s movement to dismiss a part of a proposed class motion criticism in opposition to it through which a job applicant accused the corporate of subjecting him and different interviewees to a synthetic intelligence-powered lie detector check with out correct notification.
Attorneys with Seyfarth Shaw, on behalf of CVS Well being Corp., moved to dismiss the third rely of the complaint brought by the plaintiff, Brendan Baker, who accused CVS of violating Massachusetts Normal Legal guidelines chapter 149, Part 19B, also referred to as the “Lie Detector Statute.” Whereas CVS didn’t problem the sufficiency of the claims that it violated the Lie Detector Statute, it moved to dismiss the rely that it failed to offer Baker enough discover of his statutory rights, in response to an order filed Feb. 16 by U.S. District Choose Patti B. Saris.
