In a belief and property case that has been ongoing since 1999, the Arizona Courtroom of Appeals has sided with petitioners who argued their award was $190,000 quick because of legal professional charges that have been improperly granted to an property.
Based on the appeals court docket’s Could 5 majority opinion penned by Decide Karl Eppich, appellants Leonard Karp and Annette Everlove objected to the Pima County Superior Courtroom’s denial of their Rule 60 movement, after trying however failing to win appeals in years prior.
